Is Your Exercise Routine Lacking Purpose?
October 6th, 2010
It’s common knowledge that regular exercise is an important part of promoting good health. However, many people shortchange themselves by following an exercise program without putting much thought into what they’re doing or why they’re doing it. This typically results in the benefits of the program being poorly aligned with the individual’s needs and goals, and in some cases, this can do more harm than good.
It goes without saying that most of us make important decisions through a process of specific and deliberate reasoning. Because exercise has a significant influence on health, and because this influence can sometimes be negative, choices relating to exercise deserve the same level of discretion. However, it’s common for people to invest their time, effort, and health into an exercise program without evaluating how appropriate it is for their needs. This greatly reduces the value they’ll gain from their effort.
Why it’s Important to Exercise Intelligently
Many people run mile after mile or spend hour after hour pounding away on a cardio machine each week simply to burn calories or satisfy the general recommendation to exercise regularly. Likewise, it’s become nearly as common for people to lift weights or use resistance training machines to develop or tone muscle. In each of these cases, it’s usually appearance based goals that provide the motivation to exercise, and it’s generally assumed that health and function related benefits will automatically follow. However, because the reasoning behind this assumption is completely backwards, such benefits are far from automatic.
Exercise has a significant influence on physiological function long before changes in appearance can be easily noticed. For example, improvements in the strength and endurance of a muscle must occur prior to a noticeable increase in its size, and improvements in cardiovascular function will begin to occur weeks before exercise alone will have a noticeable impact on weight loss. As such, it’s impossible to alter appearance through exercise without causing physiological adaptations in the process, and it would be unwise to assume that these adaptations are always desirable. Furthermore, it would be wasteful and potentially harmful to endure the physical burden of strenuous training when the adaptations that result are of little value. The average person wanting to lose weight or improve cardiovascular health certainly doesn’t need to develop the aerobic capacity of an endurance athlete to achieve such goals, but many people exercise as if they do.
Those who exercise to alter their appearance or achieve other secondary benefits tend to neglect the more important exercise principles that promote good health and function. Unfortunately, doing so can often have more of a negative impact on quality of life than a positive one, and when this is the case, the secondary benefits that are gained rarely justify the pain and dysfunction that may accompany them. While there’s nothing wrong with exercising to improve appearance, it makes much more sense to pursue such a goal with an approach that emphasizes good health and function as higher priorities.
The Dark Side of Exercise
There’s no doubt that it can be very beneficial to exercise on a regular basis. Doing so has been shown to improve mood and cognitive function, reduce fatigue, improve physical function, and help prevent disease.1 In general, exercise has a tremendous potential to improve quality of life, but when appearance and other secondary benefits are a higher priority than health and function, exercise can have the opposite effect. In many cases, this is because the desire for rapid and dramatic results overshadows sound exercise principles.
Weight loss is an excellent example. The excessive amount of higher intensity aerobic exercise that people commonly do just to burn calories puts a considerable amount of physiological burden on the body. Anyone who exercises like this on a regular basis is likely to compromise their health by consistently exceeding their capacity to recover, especially if they’re under stress, not eating well, or not getting enough sleep, all of which are common characteristics of modern life. Over time, this often leads to chronic symptoms such as fatigue, anxiety, depression, and irritability that can take months to recover from.2,3 Any other form of moderate to high intensity exercise, especially resistance training, can also have this effect when done too frequently.
Training to improve appearance through an increase in muscle size is another great example. People who do this tend to focus most of their effort on the muscles that they think will have the greatest impact on their appearance. In the process, they usually train the opposing muscles much less frequently or don’t train them at all. This creates imbalances in strength and flexibility that can cause pain, limit function, and increase the risk of injury.4 Other forms of exercise that repetitively work opposing muscle groups in an uneven manner can also cause imbalances. This is especially the case with aerobic exercise because of it’s repetitive nature.
Most forms of exercise cause low level tissue damage5-7 as well as other forms of physiological stress such as oxidative and free radical damage,8,9 and the more strenuously and frequently one exercises, the more this applies. Although this damage and stress is much of what provokes the body to repair itself and become more resilient and fit, it can also accelerate the aging process10 and increase the risk of injury.5 Therefore, there’s a fine line between exercising to improve health, function, and general wellness and overexercising to the extent of accelerating the aging process and inviting chronic pain. If you’re going to burden your body with strenuous exercise, you should be sure that there’s a justifiable purpose behind it, and it would be in your best interest to structure your training and lifestyle in a way that minimizes the potential for undesirable effects.
Burning Calories or Burning Out?
Burning calories to lose weight is one of the most common reasons why people overexercise. As I just explained, this approach can be unhealthy, and the extent of direct fitness improvements that result are generally of little use or value to the average person. Diet is a much more important factor for weight loss,11 and based on this, exercising excessively to burn calories is nothing more than a compensation for poor dietary choices. This is a case of one health compromising habit being compensated for by another. It increases the potential for undesirable effects and makes it a questionable approach, especially since it doesn’t address the primary cause of the problem. Based on this, I think weight loss alone is very poor justification for a high volume of intense exercise. This is one of the reasons why I’m not a fan of programs like the P90X that prescribe an arguably excessive volume of exercise primarily to increase energy expenditure.
In my opinion, those who doubt the effectiveness of proper diet as the primary focus of a weight loss program either don’t understand what a truly healthy diet is or simply aren’t dedicated enough to make the necessary changes. Contrary to what most people tend to think, following a healthy diet with an intent to lose weight doesn’t imply the need to obsessively count calories. In fact, I think calorie counting is a flawed approach that’s used as another way to compensate for poor food choices. What I consider to be a truly healthy diet is one that’s well rounded and based primarily on whole foods such as meat, fish, fruit, vegetables, nuts, and seeds. Following such a diet provides the nutrients needed to support optimal health, makes it much more difficult to overeat, and therefore eliminates the need to obsess over daily calorie intake. This is the natural and healthy way to lose weight and keep it off. Exercise, ideally for other more important purposes than simply burning calories, is merely a bonus that will facilitate the process.
Misconceptions About Metabolism
Metabolism is commonly discussed in association with exercise and weight loss, but it often seems to be poorly understood. Although it’s defined as the sum of all chemical reactions that occur in the body,12 most people perceive it as more of a calorie burning potential, and as such, consider a “fast” metabolism to be desirable.
Given the energy demands imposed by exercise, metabolic rate can increase dramatically during an exercise session. Depending on the intensity and type of exercise, metabolic rate can even remain elevated long after activity has ended. This is due to the tissue repair, energy replenishment, and other physiological adaptations that often occur in response to strenuous physical activity.13-16 Metabolic rate can even be increased on a more permanent basis by any type of exercise that increases lean body mass.17,18 However, although these alterations in metabolic rate result in more energy expenditure at rest, this may not be as desirable as it seems. Despite some exceptions for certain species, an increased rate of metabolism has been associated with a shorter lifespan.19,20 Much of this association is believed to be a result of an increase in free radical and oxidative damage, both of which can be caused by exercise and other forms of strenuous physical activity.19,10
Use It or Lose It but Don’t Overdo It
Based on the potential for excessive exercise to increase metabolism and cause free radical and oxidative damage, it can be argued that the more one exercises, the more likely it is that they’ll age more rapidly. However, not exercising enough can be a serious problem as well. It’s been clearly established that insufficient exercise can lead to an accelerated decline in health and even result in premature death.21,22 As such, it’s clearly important to exercise regularly, but if you choose to follow a strenuous exercise program that exceeds the demands of what’s necessary to promote optimal health, the decision should be supported by a meaningful purpose that justifies the additional physiological burden. In addition, training should be planned intelligently to minimize unnecessary burden, and excellent lifestyle habits should be followed closely to improve capacity and recovery.
What About Athletes and Sports?
Those who try to justify their excessive exercise habits based on the tremendous amount of wear and tear that athletes expose their bodies to are failing to appreciate an important point. The opportunity to compete in a sport is something that most athletes value deeply, and as a result, it’s often a valuable source of fulfillment for them. In contrast, anyone who trains with the intensity or volume of an athlete just to burn calories is wearing down their body and getting little value in return, especially since focusing primarily on diet is a much more sensible and reliable way to lose weight. In addition, even athletes need to intelligently plan their training and competitive schedules to minimize any unnecessary physiological burden. In fact, this is critical because it reduces their risk of injury and allows them to train for the variety of fitness and skill requirements of their sport without exceeding their individual capacities. The athletes who don’t appreciate this are much more likely to become injured or fatigued and have a much less rewarding experience with competition.
Many people who dislike gyms and regimented exercise programs prefer to stay active by participating in sports. They rely on the spontaneity and competition of sports to keep them motivated. Although this is perfectly reasonable and is certainly better than not exercising at all, there are some disadvantages to consider. As I already mentioned, playing a sport can and usually does expose the body to a significant amount of physical stress. The dynamic and explosive nature of most sports greatly increases the risk for injury, and anyone who competes without preparing themselves for this risk is much more likely to encounter problems that nullify many of the benefits of staying active. For example, most sports involve jumping which can expose bones, joints, muscles, and connective tissue to forces as great as 10 times body weight.23 This much force is an obvious risk for someone who’s not conditioned for it, especially if they’re overweight or have a history of lower body injuries. I’m definitely not trying to discourage people from participating in sports, but am instead suggesting that anyone who chooses to do so should consider themselves an athlete and prepare as such. In other words, be fit for your sport instead of using your sport to be fit.
Tennis is one of the more popular choices for adults looking to stay active by playing a sport. It’s also an excellent example of why it’s important to be physically prepared. As an avid tennis player, I’ve seen a lot of recreational players incur serious injuries and I know many players who wear one or more braces or straps to deal with chronic pain. The incidence of tennis injuries has been shown to be as high as 3 per player per year and includes a variety of debilitating problems such as tendinitis, torn muscle and connective tissue, and stress fractures. These injuries also tend to occur in critical areas of the body such as the ankles, knees, lower back, shoulder, elbows, and wrists.24 Tennis even has a common form of elbow tendinitis named after it. The many adults who’ve damaged their bodies by using tennis or any other sport as an alternative to structured exercise are likely to agree that it’s wise for recreational and serious athletes alike to be prepared for the physical demands of their sport.
A Healthful and Intelligent Approach to Exercise
The most intelligent, effective, and healthful approach to exercise is to focus on specific benefits relating to health and function that are closely related to your needs and goals. Beyond the common goals of burning calories, building muscle, and improving general health, few people consider how they can benefit from exercise more specifically. It’s worth investing some thought into this because proper planning can make an exercise program much more effective, and in turn, lead to much greater improvements in quality of life. For example, someone who suffers from joint pain and limited function would be much better served by a strength and mobility program that’s focused on solving their problems than general aerobic exercise. This is not to say that aerobic exercise wouldn’t have a place in their program, but rather that it shouldn’t necessarily be the primary focus. In contrast, more of a focus on aerobic exercise would be a better choice for someone who easily becomes winded from walking a flight of stairs or performing basic daily tasks.
With proper planning, the body is spared from excessive burden, time is saved, and the invested effort delivers results that are more meaningful. Planning also makes it easier to address multiple aspects of fitness, and in turn, promote a well rounded state of physical wellness that includes the strength, range of motion, and endurance needed to perform daily activities with minimal discomfort and risk of injury. This is particularly important for both serious and recreational athletes due to the additional demands put on their bodies, and it’s even more important for older individuals who are losing the ability to perform basic functions such as climbing stairs or getting out of a chair.
Guidelines for Basic Fitness Goals
It’s pretty obvious that weight loss is the most common reason why people exercise, or at least why they exercise as much as they do. As I previously suggested, weight loss shouldn’t be the primary focus of an exercise program. The influence that exercise has on weight loss should be regarded as a secondary benefit, and as such, anyone looking to lose weight should focus their exercise program on other goals that are more specific to fitness and physical function.
Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States, and approximately every minute, an American dies from a heart related complication.25 Aerobic exercise has been shown to improve cardiovascular function, and in turn, help prevent heart disease.26,27 As such, improving or maintaining cardiovascular health is an excellent fitness goal for everyone, and as I already said, this doesn’t require the rigors of training like an endurance athlete. A simple and appropriate guideline to achieve this goal is to perform aerobic exercise 2 to 5 times per week for a half hour or more at an intensity of about 50% to 70% of maximum heart rate,28-30 or the highest intensity that allows for conversation with little to no difficulty. The lower end of this frequency applies to those who engage in other physical activities, and the upper end of the range is for those who don’t. People who are more adventurous and looking for a little more intensity can substitute two days of this steady state aerobic exercise with a day or two of high intensity interval training. Although this type of training puts a significant demand on the body, it also offers additional physiological benefits that can help promote optimal health if not overdone.31 It can also provide even greater cardiovascular benefits than steady state aerobic exercise alone.32
Although it’s a goal that’s not nearly as common as improving appearance or performance, maintaining and promoting a full range of pain free movement should be a top priority for everyone. This is especially the case for people who aren’t very active. Strength and flexibility naturally decline with age, particularly in those who are less active. Over time, this decline can lead to limitations in physical function and be the root cause of chronic pain.1,33-36,49 Bone density also decreases with age, especially in the absence of weight bearing forces.37-39 Strength training and stretching can help to prevent and reverse age related declines in strength, flexibility, and bone density1,40-44,49 and should therefore be priorities for anyone who wants to maintain healthy and strong bones along with the ability to easily perform basic movements through a full and pain free range of motion. 30 to 45 minutes of strength training done 2 to 3 times per week and stretching each major muscle group at least 2 times per week is more than adequate to meet these goals.28-30 Although it’s not necessary to workout at a gym or lift heavy weights, it’s best to at least include multijoint lower body exercises such as squat, deadlift, or lunge based movements with an emphasis on proper technique.
Regardless of what your training goals are, it’s important to maintain balance. The first aspect of this is to maintain a balance across different areas of fitness. For example, you don’t want to be very strong but have such poor aerobic fitness that you’re winded after walking up a flight of stairs. With this in mind, it’s important to periodically vary the focus of your training, and you can do this by emphasizing one type of training while still including a minimal amount of other types of training for maintenance. For example, a well rounded exercise routine should include strength training, cardiovascular training, and flexibility training while emphasizing one of these areas but not completely neglecting the others. The second aspect of balance is to ensure that the exercises you choose collectively promote a balance of strength and flexibility around joints and between opposing major muscle groups. Failure to do this can lead to poor posture and an increased risk for pain and injury.4,45-48
A Greater Quality of Life
The key thing to remember about exercise is that regardless of one’s specific goals, the ultimate goal is to improve quality of life, or to at least prevent it from declining. Consider the innate ability of a baby to learn and utilize the full squat position. This is a basic human movement that many adults lose the ability to perform as early as their 20s or 30s. Over time, it can progress to the level of not being able to get up from a chair or climb a flight of stairs without pain and difficulty. Similar trends of avoidable degeneration prevent people from participating in activities they enjoy and can even make it excessively difficult to perform basic functions such as walking. This can clearly have a significantly negative impact on quality of life. Exercising in a random and unplanned fashion is unlikely to prevent such problems or promote desired improvements nearly as well as a fitness program designed with a specific purpose in mind.
Also remember that in conjunction with a truly healthy diet and lifestyle, the guidelines discussed here are more than adequate to support and facilitate weight loss. The wear and tear of following a high volume exercise program with the primary intention of burning calories can actually accelerate the physical limitations just described, and in turn, lessen one’s quality of life instead of improving it.
Next time you exercise, ask yourself how the particular activity that you’re doing relates to your goals and needs and if it’s the most appropriate and effective way to pursue such improvements. If you’re not sure how exercise can improve your life, then maybe it’s time to give this some thought. By putting more effort into identifying the benefits of exercise that specifically relate to your goals and needs, and by planning your exercise routine accordingly, your quality of life is likely to improve by a much larger margin.
Post this on Facebook
Support this on StumbleUpon
Email this to friends
Leave a comment










I do the Super8 Interval cardio training only 2x a week. I try to get in some walking on the other days. I weight train 3 times a week. Is that enough?
Hi Sharon,
It depends on what your goals are, what your capacity is, and what you’re actually doing during each workout, but in general, I think it sounds like a good routine.
This is a monster post – where’ve you been though – you didn’t have anything new for a long time. Great post though!!!!
Thanks, Marlon!
I’m working on a master’s degree, and as you can probably tell, I’ve been putting much more research into each article. This means that it takes me more time to write them, and because of my coursework as well as life in general, I unfortunately have less time to do it. However, I hope it’s apparent that both my coursework and additional research are increasing the quality and value of what I write. I also hope everyone can see that it’s not because of laziness or apathy that I haven’t been writing as frequently. That’s not the case at all.
Hey Vin, great to see a new post. Looks like you’ve been keeping busy!
For the past several months, I’ve been trying to find that sweet spot of just enough exercise to meet my goals and stay injury free. By constantly reassessing how my exercise is helping me achieve my goals and gradually making changes to my routine, I feel like I’m more fit than I have been in years.
Much of the content available online focuses on dietary and exercise advice to achieve short-term appearance goals, without consideration for long-term quality of life. Nice to see a different perspective.
Thanks, Fran! Great to hear from you!
Sounds like you’re on the right track. Unfortunately, quick and dramatic is what most people seem to be looking for, so it’s not a huge surprise that we see a lot of this shortsighted approach in articles and products.
Hi Vin – thank you for this article! In the past few years I’ve run three full marathons and several half-marathons. This year I had to cut back on running (with plenty of guilt) and started walking and incorporating weights and yoga a few times a week instead. I was surprised to find that I actually lost a few pounds and have much more energy. I was also a vegetarian during my heaviest running years and ate a lot of refined carbs and sugar. Earlier this year, I started eating meat again and limiting my sugar intake and I feel a million times better. I certainly found this article insightful. Thanks so much again. I really enjoy reading your posts.
Hi Lisa, thanks for sharing your experience! It’s great to hear that you’re feeling better!
Ironically, the stress of a high exercise volume can inhibit weight loss, so I’m not too surprised that you lost some weight after reducing your running volume.
This was a very in-depth and informative post on an issue that doesn’t get discussed nearly enough. I’ve found with a lot of my personal training clients an initial belief that exercise will be the “fix” for weight management. I’ve learned to paint a very realistic picture for them that while exercise is certainly an important peice of the puzzle it’s not the only peice. From a fat loss standpoint, dietary changes will swing a much bigger door than aerobic exercise for example. Excellent blog, keep up the good work! Shane.
Hi Shane, thanks for your comment! It’s always great to see trainers address the true cause of weight gain instead of merely compensating for it.
Being a fitness professional this was an amazing article explaining my beliefs about fitness and weight loss. I have made similar arguments for basketball. For example low to moderate aerobic exercise is not really needed. Improving strength, speed, and improving performance in short interval workouts are the best way to lose weight long term!
Hi Jeremy, I’m glad you enjoyed the article! I think your beliefs about fitness for basketball apply to most team sports, especially those involving explosive movements. Whether or not an athlete needs to lose weight, this type of training is more specific to the requirements of their sport.
Well comprised and written article, your degree work is clearly evident here. It is inspiring too read that a healthy lifestyle is a balanced lifestyle. Advertising can sometimes lead us to believe that looking good means you are living good and we may just need a little more than just a few bicep curls or diet membership to cut down on our unbalance lifestyle habits and the aging factors that we all do not want to recognize. Now that I am at a age that I can feel the years there is an interesting fact that we all battle that I am trying to incorporate into my lifestyle habits. Which is that maximum attainable strength peaks in mid-twenties and declines thereafter. The decline increases as we age and the decline is most precipitous after 65 years of age. This may sound as a discouraging note for all readers of your blog, but really it should be an incentive that what you are saying will rid your life of the feebleness of old age. Just look around you and you can see it and sometimes old age is 40.
There is a lot of research of the benefits of the over 65 age group exercising to prevent the many injuries caused by age related feebleness. I do not see much on the effect of sarcopenia on the exercising age group of 25 to 65. Apparently a lifestyle routine must change as we age. We may think but we are not 25 forever. How should we change our eating and exercising habits as we age? Should we do more or do less? Do less aerobic and more strength, or not? Do we need different nutrients at 40 than at 30? Sarcopenia is a fact we have to accept and find ways on how to cope with it so not to get discouraged. We all probably could not live like or want to be a Jack LaLanne but we all probably would like to “Live young Forever”. So in your academic pursuits could you please find a magic bullet on this subject?
Hi George, thanks for your support!
There’s no doubt that strength declines with age and that the extent of this can be countered with training. In fact, most people are so far from their genetic capacity for strength development that they can be much stronger than ever before even in their 60s. I’ve even seen pictures of men in their 70s who have much more muscle than many men half their age. Here’s a few of them. Inspiring to say the least.
I agree that the potential to be fit and healthy at an old age should be inspiring. You’re right that you can see the loss of function from a sedentary and lazy lifestyle in people as young as 40, and it’s even obvious with some people in their 30s that they’re headed in this direction.
Here’s a review of some research covering the 40 to 65 age group and beyond. It claims that older people can make similar gains through strength training as younger people. This was even shown with people in the age range of 87 to 96.
Evans WJ, Campbell WW. “Sarcopenia and Age-Related Changes in Body Composition and Functional Capacity.” Journal of Nutrition. 1993. 123:465-468.
I suspect that one’s genetic potential for maximum strength and power is less obtainable with advanced age, but for the large majority of older people, including athletes, this is irrelevant. For example, most people probably have the genetic potential to achieve a 500 pound deadlift, but how many seniors care to be or need to be this strong? What’s inspiring is that someone who’s body is in relatively good condition could probably still get quite close if they wanted to. It might take longer and require more dedication to factors outside of the gym, but that certainly doesn’t mean that it can’t happen.
Whether or not we need different nutrients based on age is an interesting question. I suspect that the amount of certain nutrients needed might change, but probably not to the extent of not being satisfied by a healthy diet. What I think is more pertinent is that we have less margin for error with deficiencies and unhealthy ingredients such as sugar, oxidized fat, and toxins. This is because physiological function declines with age and tissue damage accumulates, both of which make us more susceptible to the onset of disease.
In line with what I just said, capacity for exercise is likely to decline with age as well. However, this shouldn’t be a major issue because we all have limits and should be mindful of them regardless of age. While it would probably be much tougher for someone who’s 20 to overtrain than someone who’s 80, both can certainly overtrain. Living a healthy lifestyle in general will greatly help to maintain a higher capacity for exercise, and in combination, these factors can greatly assist older individuals in maintaining a high level of energy and physical function.
In regard to the type of exercise, I think this is something that should be based more on goals than age. It’s likely that fitness goals will change with age, and in turn, dictate the need for a different type of training program, but I don’t think the training goal (i.e. strength vs. endurance) should be based directly on age. Power (the ability to apply strength in a rapid manner) is one potential exception to this since it declines with age even more so than strength. As such, explosive high speed training can be an important part of minimizing the physical effects of aging, even if the resistance needs to be low and the speed of execution isn’t all that fast compared to what would be appropriate for a younger person. Although power is normally associated with sports and high performance, it’s also required at a lesser but still important extent for basic functions such as avoiding a fall, getting up from a chair, or walking up a flight of stairs.
I’ll do my best to find the “magic bullet.”
As you can probably tell, minimizing the negative effects of aging (in a healthy way) is a big interest for me.
Well written post! Other than enjoyment, I need a purpose behind my exercise. Currently, I’m on a running kick. I started long distance running because its always been difficult for me. I played a lot of basketball and running is how coach punished us. But, I ran a Half-Marathon two months ago and I’m going to run a full later this year. Good stuff you go here. I’m glad I stopped by.
Thanks, Ralph!
That’s a great point. I think everyone should be able to explain the specific reasons why they do each and every exercise that they do, and the answer should have some substance relating to improved function and wellbeing. There’s nothing wrong with exercising for fun, but why not make it as useful as possible, and more importantly, ensure that it’s not being done in a detrimental way.
Likewise, people who work with trainers shouldn’t be afraid to ask why they’re doing the exercises that they’re told to do. It will help them learn and may even help some people realize that they’re wasting money on a bad trainer.
I remember watching an interview with Roger Federer that was about his fitness training. He said that he didn’t mind the hard work as long as he knew the purpose of what he was being told to do and that he believed it would contribute to his tennis game. Everyone should have this attitude! And Roger happens to be one of the fittest players on tour, and one who hasn’t had a serious injury in a ridiculously long time for a professional tennis player.