How to Minimize Your Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields

by Vin Miller

Electromagnetic RadiationThe tremendous amount of electromagnetic radiation produced by modern technology has been associated with many health concerns. Although it’s impossible to completely avoid this radiation, there are fortunately a number of precautions that you can take to minimize your exposure.

Because electromagnetic radiation is such a complicated subject, one of the biggest challenges is simply understanding what it is. Once you have a basic understanding of electromagnetic fields and the radiation that they produce, it’s much easier to identify the different forms, appreciate the dangers that they pose, and understand what can be done to reduce your risk.

The Electromagnetic Spectrum

Electromagnetic fields are the combination of an electric field and a magnetic field and are created by electrical current. The electromagnetic radiation produced by modern technology is the energy that is generated by such fields. The following table lists the different ranges of electromagnetic radiation along with some of their common sources.

Frequency Range Type Common Sources
3 Hz – 3 KHz Extremely Low Frequency Power lines, appliances, electronics
3 KHz – 300 MHz Radio Waves AM/FM radio, television broadcasting, CB radios
300 MHz – 300 GHz Microwaves Cell phones, wireless internet, satellite broadcasting, microwave ovens, radar, medical imaging
300 GHz – 300 THz Infrared radiation Lasers, alarm systems, motion detectors
300 THz – 30 PHz Ultraviolet radiation Fluorescent and incandescent lights
300 THz – 30 PHz X-rays X-ray medical imaging
30 PHz – 30 EHz Gamma rays Nuclear material

The Thermal and Ionizing Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation

The electromagnetic radiation with the highest frequencies and shortest wavelengths tend to contain the most energy and be the most dangerous. X-rays and gamma rays are considered to be ionizing radiation because they have enough energy to detach electrons from atoms and turn them into ions. This can cause permanent damage at the cellular level including genetic mutation and cancer.

Although radio waves and microwaves aren’t ionizing, they can have thermal effects that causes tissue to overheat and become damaged. This is how microwave ovens cook food and is one of the primary reasons why there’s such concern over the safety of cell phone usage.

It’s well known that thermal and ionizing effects of high frequency electromagnetic radiation are dangerous. However, the health effects of lower frequency radiation, often referred to as biological effects, are a much more controversial issue that isn’t getting the attention or respect that it deserves despite a significant amount of convincing evidence.

Because the body is reliant on the earth’s natural electromagnetic field and its own subtle electrical currents, it’s very sensitive to electromagnetic fields. As such, the radiation produced by modern technology can interfere with human biological function even at frequencies that are much lower than the thermal and ionizing ranges.

How to Measure Electromagnetic Radiation

Since you typically can’t see or feel electromagnetic fields, they can be very difficult to detect which is one of the many reasons why electromagnetic radiation is so unsettling.

For important situations such as choosing a new home or office, the most reliable option is to hire an experienced electrical engineer to take measurements for you. They will be much more likely to have the expertise and advanced equipment necessary to make an accurate assessment. For situations that are less critical, you can buy your own meter at an affordable price. I have the TriField Electromagnetic Field Meter which measures electric fields, magnetic fields, and radiation in the radio and microwave ranges.

If you’d rather not spend money on a meter, you can use a portable battery operated AM radio to detect electric fields, but it’s obviously not as precise and won’t detect magnetic fields. You can set the radio to a station that receives no signal and turn the volume up. When the radio encounters an electric field, which is generally also a good indication of a magnetic field, you’ll hear noise. Although this won’t give you a clear indication of how strong the field is, it will at least let you know that it exists.

Units of Measurement

Measurements of low frequency electromagnetic radiation are usually based on magnetic field strength. Based on a conservative evaluation of existing research, most experts who are concerned about the dangers of electromagnetic radiation recommend 1 milligauss or less as a desirable reading. However, some research has shown unfavorable results even at this level. Some urban areas have ambient fields of 3 milligauss or higher. Even though this is regarded as safe by some standards, many experts suggest doing as much as possible to reduce exposure to lower levels.

The higher frequencies of electromagnetic radiation are measured by power density instead of magnetic field strength. Although different frequencies of radio and microwave radiation can have varying effects, a power density of 1 milliwatt per centimeter squared is generally considered safe in the United States. However, many experts believe that this is too much. The standard in Russia is 100 times more protective at 1 microwatt per centimeter squared, and undesirable health effects have even been found at levels below this.

Electrical Power Lines and Residential Wiring

One of the most common sources of low frequency electromagnetic radiation is power lines. Depending on which country you live in, the electrical current that flows through power lines alternates at a frequency of 50 or 60 Hertz which produces electromagnetic radiation at the same frequency. Some power lines operate at very high voltages with a significant amount of current running through them, and if your house or office is close enough to them, you may be continuously exposed to potentially dangerous levels of electromagnetic radiation. A considerable amount of research has linked cancer and a number of other health concerns with the electromagnetic radiation produced by power lines which has made them the subject of numerous lawsuits regarding health issues and real estate devaluation.

The electrical wiring in homes and offices is also a concern. Wiring can still produce electromagnetic fields even without anything being plugged into it’s outlets. Incorrect wiring, which is usually more common in older homes and buildings, is especially problematic because it can produce much stronger electromagnetic fields.

If the measurements throughout hour home or office are consistently elevated, chances are that it’s coming from power lines or faulty wiring. Although it might be a large and potentially costly project, faulty wiring can be fixed relatively easily. Ambient electromagnetic fields from power lines, however, can only be avoided by relocating to a different area or taking action against the utility company. Because of the difficulty and inconvenience associated with either course of action, it’s important to properly assess a home or office for electromagnetic radiation exposure prior to moving in.

Electronics and Appliances

Electromagnetic fields from electronic devices and appliances are one of the most common sources of radiation in homes and offices. As such, it’s important to measure the magnetic fields produced by all of the commonly used electronics and appliances in your home and office. By doing so, you can identify which items present the most risk and the distance at which their radiation drops to a safe level. It’s even a good idea to measure electronics and appliances when they’re shut off because they can still produce electromagnetic fields as long as they’re plugged in. Microwave ovens are notorious for this.

The items that were found to produce potentially dangerous electromagnetic fields should either be replaced or used as infrequently as possible. I recently replaced a computer monitor that produced a magnetic field of 100 milligauss at 3 feet away. This is 100 times the recommended level of 1 milligauss, and I spent a considerable amount of time in front of this monitor. Fortunately, the newer flat screen monitors produce a much weaker magnetic field that’s undetectable at 3 feet away which is about how far you should aim to have your monitor from your face.

When using electrical equipment or appliances, especially when first turning them on, you can reduce your exposure to their electromagnetic fields by standing as far away from them as possible. It’s also a good idea to stay out of the kitchen when using the oven or dishwasher, or to at least avoid standing directly in front of them. If you use a hair dryer, try to hold it as far away from your head as possible, and if you use an electric razor, consider switching to a regular razor.

Here are the ranges of magnetic field measurements provided by the Environmental Protection Agency for a number common electrical devices and appliances. For most of these items, I included measurements taken in my home. All measurements are in milligauss.

Source Range 6″ 1′ 2′ 4′
 
Hair Dryer low 1 - - -
median 300 - - -
high 700 70 10 1
home > 100 75 9 -
 
Electric Razor low 4 - - -
median 100 20 - -
high 600 100 10 1
home 10 3 - -
 
Blender low 30 5 - -
median 70 10 2 -
high 100 20 3 -
home > 100 > 100 30 1
 
Dishwasher low 10 6 2 -
median 20 10 4 -
high 100 30 7 1
home 75 10 6 -
 
Garbage Disposal low 60 8 1 -
median 80 10 2 -
high 100 20 3 -
home 75 50 17 1
 
Microwave Oven low 100 1 1 -
median 200 40 10 2
high 300 200 30 20
home > 100 > 100 > 100 25
 
Electric Oven low 4 1 - -
median 9 4 - -
high 20 5 1 -
home 9 4 2 -
 
Toaster low 5 - - -
median 10 3 - -
high 20 7 - -
home > 100 75 10 -
 
Refrigerator low - - - -
median 2 2 1 -
high 40 20 10 10
home - - - -
 
Iron low 6 1 - -
median 8 1 - -
high 20 3 - -
home 50 12 2 -
 
Vacuum Cleaner low 100 20 4 -
median 300 60 10 1
high 700 200 50 10
home > 100 > 100 75 3
 
Television low - - - -
median 7 2 - -
high 20 8 4 -
home 6 2 1 -
 
Alarm Clock low - - - -
median 1 - - -
high 8 2 1 -
home 1 < 1 < 1 - -
home 2 8 2 1 -
 
Power Drill low 100 20 3 -
median 150 30 4 -
high 200 40 6 -
home > 100 > 100 > 100 5
 
Power Saw low 50 9 1 -
median 200 40 5 -
high 1000 300 40 4
home > 100 > 100 > 100 15

Communication Towers and Antennas

In addition to the ambient electromagnetic fields produced by power lines, we are constantly exposed to an ever increasing amount of radio and microwave radiation from communication towers and antennas. This includes signals for radio, television, and satellite broadcasting, cell phones, military radar and communication, air traffic control, and local police and fire department communication.

Like power lines, communication towers and antennas have been the subject of numerous lawsuits and the cause of real estate devaluation. However, this is where the similarities end. Radio and microwave radiation covers a much larger spectrum and is produced by a variety of sources in a number of different forms. Less research has been done on the health effects of radio and microwave radiation, there is very little regulation, and the entire subject is surrounded by a lot of controversy. Some of the research that does exist has linked radio and microwave radiation to cataracts, reproductive issues, sleeping disorders, headaches, anxiety, impaired mental function, impaired lung function, Lou Gehrig’s disease, and multiple forms of cancer.

As with power lines, there’s not much that can be done to reduce exposure to the electromagnetic radiation produced by local communication towers and antennas. As such, it’s best to be aware of their presence prior to moving into a new home or office and to do everything you can to prevent new installations.

Cell Phones, Cordless Phones, and Wireless Internet

Because these technologies are convenient and have become a ubiquitous part of modern life, many people are resistant to the possibility that the radio and microwave radiation they produce is a legitimate health risk. The radiation produced by cell phones can produce both thermal and non thermal effects and is recognized by many experts as a cancer risk. The advent of high speed networks has resulted in more people using the internet through their phones which has significantly increased the amount of ambient electromagnetic radiation and also puts such users at more risk.

To minimize your exposure to cell phone radiation, use speakerphone or a wired headset, avoid using bluetooth headsets, don’t allow your conversations to be any longer than necessary, minimize your use of data features, and keep your phone turned off as often as possible, especially when carrying it close to your body. By following these suggestions, you may even be able to reduce your bill and enjoy fewer interruptions. For more information on cell phone radiation, including the radiation ratings of most phone models, visit the Environmental Working Group’s Cell Phone Radiation Guide.

Cordless phones and wireless internet routers are also a concern because of the amount of electromagnetic radiation that they continuously produce. In fact, they typically produce more radiation than cell phones. To minimize your exposure, use regular corded telephones and wired internet connections. If you insist on using wireless devices, at least use a timer to keep them turned off while you sleep.

Keep in mind that the radiation produced by these devices is similar in concept to second hand cigarette smoke. Your usage can affect the people around you, and your cordless phones and wireless routers can even affect your neighbors.

Medical Imaging Equipment

Medical imaging is another significant source of electromagnetic radiation that doesn’t get the attention or respect that it deserves. Although it’s fairly common knowledge that x-rays are harmful and that they should be taken as infrequently as possible, there are also concerns about other types of imaging such as MRI, CAT scan, ultrasound, and mammography. Although these technologies are extremely helpful for diagnosing medical conditions, they also produce a significant amount of radiation, and some experts believe that they’re used far too frequently. In fact, Dr. Robert Becker believes that medical facilities are pressured into recommending the use of these devices to help pay for their high cost. He also believes that many doctors abuse them as screening tools when they should really be used to confirm strong suspicions of a specific diagnosis.

The Most Important Place and Time to Reduce Exposure

Quality sleep is one of the most important aspects of good health. Exposure to electromagnetic radiation while you sleep can impair your body’s ability to repair itself and fight illness. In addition to following good sleep habits, it’s important to minimize the electromagnetic fields surrounding your bed as much as possible.

Many people sleep with an alarm clock close to their head and their bed close to electrical outlets. In addition, some people use electric blankets or sleep on water beds that are electrically heated. These are both continuous sources of strong electromagnetic fields that are present throughout the entire night. To minimize your exposure while you sleep, keep your alarm clock away from your head, power it with batteries instead of plugging it in, shut off the circuit that feeds the outlets near your bed, and if you sleep on a water bed or use an electric blanket, turn them off before getting into bed.

Ley lines and underground rivers can also interfere with your sleep by altering the earth’s natural electromagnetic field. If your sleep isn’t as restorative as you’d like and you feel that you’ve done everything you can to improve it, try moving your bed to a different part of the room. Alternatively, before you decide to rearrange your bedroom, you can try sleeping in a different room to see if you notice a difference.

Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?

The tremendous amount of electromagnetic radiation that we’re exposed to today can be very unsettling, but it does more harm than good to stress over it. What’s important is that you do your best to minimize your risk in the most practical ways possible. Although it might take some effort to do so, there’s no reason to be anxious about it.

To assess your level of exposure, use a device like the TriField Electromagnetic Field Meter to take your own measurements, or hire a professional to do it for you. For each source of electromagnetic radiation that you’re exposed to, including those that can’t be measured, assess your level of risk and decide if the exposure is justified by the benefits that it offers. For example, it’s probably not worthwhile to chat unnecessarily on a cell phone or have an excessive number of ultrasounds during pregnancy, but in other situations, the same technologies can save lives. Likewise, you might not be able to reduce your exposure beyond a certain point without moving to a new home or office.

For a better understanding of electromagnetic radiation and how to minimize your exposure, I highly recommend reading Electromagnetic Fields by B. Blake Levitt and Cross Currents by Robert Becker MD.

Stay informed of new articles by email!

Related Articles

9 Responses

  1. Sharona says:

    Thanks so much for this article. I only use my cell phone for long distance and for emergencies. It’s always turned off and not many have the cell number. I don’t even have the number memorized..that is how little I use it.
    I also put a Ceramat on my bed. It generates negative ions and a bit of far infrared heat and deflects EMFs while you are sleeping. Plus, I don’t need to use heat in the winter while I sleep because the mat heats up nice and toasty. You can purchase one at http://www.ceragem.com. Their thermo massage beds are amazing also.
    Unfortunately, I live in an apartment, so I’m not sure about what kind of wiring is going on here. I have no control of certain things like building materials, water, EMFs in this building. I unplugged my microwave and put it away about 3 years ago. I use landline phones and I do have a cordless phone in my living room. It’s plugged in but I hardly use it (I just like the caller ID on it).
    My PC screen is flat and I bought it in 2006, so I hope it’s ok.
    Doing the best I can!

    • Vin Miller says:

      Hi Sharona, thanks for your comment!

      Although Ceragem claims that their pad absorbs electromagnetic radiation from other sources, the following statement leads me to believe that it creates some radiation of it’s own as well:

      “The patented 3-layer heating wire allows the electrical currents to flow in opposite directions to minimize EMF production.”

      Regardless of how well and consciously this pad is designed, I would be concerned about sleeping on anything that produces current. There are even bed pads that are meant to produce a therapeutic electromagnetic field, and although some types of electromagnetic radiation are indeed therapeutic, some people believe that they can be detrimental if overused. Sleeping on such a pad every night is a lot of exposure!

      Perhaps in a situation where there is ambient electromagnetic radiation that can’t be eliminated, the Ceragem pad could have a net reducing effect, but I think it would be very difficult to know for sure. If I had unavoidable radiation in my bedroom, I would consider putting a mesh screen over my bed to block it before using any type of electrical bed pad. I know that sounds extreme and unsightly, but it’s definitely a much more conservative approach.

      You might want to rethink keeping your cordless phone around just for the caller ID. From what I understand, the base station of a cordless phone constantly transmits signals. I have two corded phones in my house and they both have a big caller ID display. ;)

      Doing the best we can is all that we can do! By putting away your microwave and minimizing your cell phone usage, you’ve already done much more than most people.

  2. I just bought an iPhone, and carry it around with me everywhere. Honestly, I can’t imagine not using it, or not using a cell phone, and even your compromises seem to strenuous to follow given how much my daily routine and work relies on instant communication in all its forms. I do appreciate the advice however of using headsets, and will endeavor to do so, so thanks for that piece of advice!

    • Vin Miller says:

      Hi Phil,

      I can appreciate how hard this is to accept after investing in an iPhone, committing to a contract, and becoming attached to its features. However, I think cell phone usage is a legitimate risk that you have to respect just as you would the risks of eating processed food. In fact, the convenience based reasoning that many people use to justify the consumption of processed foods is similar to that used for frequent cell phone usage.

      If your job requires the use of a cell phone and this is something that you’re willing to accept, then all you can do is make the best compromise possible and not obsess over it. There are still precautions you can take such as limiting your use to essential business conversations, using a wired headset instead of holding the phone against your head, not using data features more than you need to, not having the phone always against your body, and shutting the phone off during the times that you don’t need it. I also suggest checking to see if there’s a way to control how often the iPhone checks for email and how frequently it performs other automated data transfers.

      There’s no right answer here. The bottom line is that you have to make a personal choice about how much potential risk you’re willing to assume in exchange for convenience and enjoyment. Like the people who live long lives despite being smokers and following awful diets, using the iPhone without restriction may not cause you any problems. It’s up to you to decide if this is a risk worth taking. Learn as much as you can and be happy with your choice.

      I know this is something that you won’t want to hear, but if you look up the iPhone, the iPhone 3G, and the iPhone 3G S on the EWG’s list of SAR ratings, all three have high (unfavorable) ratings which is also worth considering.

  3. Hey Vin, truly valuable information. This is a powerful, yet silent threat that everyone needs to be aware of. Thanks!

  4. Wow, thanks for the comprehensive post of electromagnetic radiation, Vin.

    Unfortunately, if you use computer all day long, it’s almost impossible to escape from them. But I heard that some crystals like black tourmaline can help to reduce electromagnetic radiation. It’s a rather cheap stone but I’ve never tested it. If you do get a chance to test it with your measurement device, do let us know. Thanks!

    • Vin Miller says:

      Hi Wee,

      I spend a lot of time in front of computers. To minimize my exposure, I keep the monitor and CPU as far away from me as possible. As you can tell from the situation I described with my old monitor, different models and brands of equipment vary in the amount of radiation that they produce which is why it’s important to get a meter and test. In my case, it made a tremendous difference.

      Based on what I’ve read, crystals and other products that claim to protect you from electromagnetic radiation only provide a minimal reduction and are not nearly as effective as minimizing or eliminating the source. Based on that, they might be good in situations where you’ve already reduced and eliminated as much as you can. I’m actually curious about such products and may order a few just to test them out.

    • Vin Miller says:

      I tested a black tourmaline crystal and a natural quartz crystal. Both are relatively small and are between 1.5″ and 2″ in size. I tested them with a laptop since this seems to be the most common use.

      I set the laptop on a table and put the TriField meter directly in front of it. Without any applications running, the magnetic field continually fluctuated between 0 and 4 milligauss. After opening a web browser, the magnetic field would fluctuate between 7 and 10 milligauss for a few seconds and then return to the 0 to 4 range. I went through this sequence for each crystal and neither had any noticeable effect. During each test, the crystal was placed directly on the laptop just below the keyboard.

      Perhaps there are benefits to using these crystals that aren’t detectable with the meter, but based on these results, I wouldn’t expect them to make much of a difference.

Leave a Reply